DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR04369-14
16 December 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Quy
Ref: (a) Title 10.U.8.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 6812/0354 of
17 Nov 2014
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed
enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced
to E-5/HM2 from the August 2013 Navy-wide Reserve advancement
examination.
2. The Board, consisting of Sissies.
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No.NR04369-14
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a Petitioner was advanced to F-5/HM2 from the August 2013 Navy-
wide Reserve advancement examination with an effective date of 16 June
2014 and a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2014.
b. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances from the
effective date forward. rs f
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record,
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter. :
DAVID J. CASH
Recorder
Sa Pursuant to the delegation of \authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
16 December 2014
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0167 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2740 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5240-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08979-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13543-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the September 2008, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03235-10
03235-10 13 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter’ referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM2/E5 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5315 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7071S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to grade his March .2014 Navy-wide advancement exam to his-September 2013 missed exam cycle. The Board, consisting ¢ ny reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5995 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO5995-14 5 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: (REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Qari Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4497 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, with this Board requesting, in effect, that record be corrected to show that he was from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement filed enclosure (1) the applicable naval advanced to E-5/FC2 cycle. NRO4497-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in Light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. S. Pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...